One of my favorite sports is that of mixed martial arts. To the people that know me this is often a surprise as I am not really a blood thirsty type of person. Yet, put mixed martial arts in front of me and suddenly I am intensely focused on the action. I know that people have a wide and differing views on the sport. To fans it can be seen as the ultimate expression of competition and to its detractors it is simply blood sport that grinds up the talent of its participants. I am Sweden on this issue – neither agreeing or disagreeing.
I remember the first match I ever watched. A very slender quite man entered the circle wearing a traditional white jujitsu gi. His opponent was a boxer that packed an additional twenty pounds of heavy bone crunching muscle. As they went through the introductions I could not believe how calm this skinny guy in white pajamas from Brazil appeared. Didn’t he know he was about to get pulverized? The other guy was fresh off of 15 straight victories and looked liked he could punch through concrete. In fact, he was so confident in his punching ability and his power to knock out his opponent he wore only one glove to the match thinking he only needed one punch to win the victory. In his mind he was the only real game in town. Two minutes later the boxer was defeated and the world of mixed martial arts was wondering who the skinny kid from Brazil was.
Fast forward to our current environment and we still see opponents that think that they can beat the competition with only one hand and that they are the only real game in town. Big Banks with somber faces and hats in hand have been claiming that, because of a Federal Reserve rule change and the financial reform bill, they now have to create new fees to make up for the ones the government banned as unfair. The money that they take with one hand is then passed on to stockholders via dividends and cooperate executives who collect fat bonus checks. That whooshing sound is the sound of money leaving your members wallet and your local community.
So how do we as cooperatives face this challenge? When I look at the page hits for the blog by far the most popular pages are those in which the concept of matching member needs are the central topics. The topics also tend to generate the most comments. A recent and very unscientific poll on the blog revealed that fifty percent of you do offer sales but only as “needs based solutions”. Twenty percent do not offer sales at all. While the poll is entertaining and extremely unscientific is does allow us to look at each other and consider our next steps as cooperatives and what exactly that means from a cultural perspective.
I think before we look forward we need to look back and also look across the table. As each of us gaze at our competitive landscape it is easy to focus on the credit union across town. Many of you have pulled the call reports and you can see that you have not suffered the losses that your local competition has (turns out participation loans are trickier than people thought) and your opt in campaign back in the spring for courtesy pay has maintained the non interest income stream for another year. Thanks to some fast and innovative promotions consumer lending is holding steady. People in the community are slightly less worried about losing their jobs so your new and used auto is beginning to trend back towards 2007 levels.
Before we all congratulate ourselves on a job well done we need to consider that many credit unions were successful in the past in spite of themselves. The margins were such that you did not have to be overly efficient and your staff could just get by using credit union charm and acting as order takers for members. The past two years have seen many credit unions grapple with hard decisions and forced efficiency gains. For many credit unions the last two years have been crucible moments in which core cultural values have been dusted off and people inside the organization have had to dig deeper to help members in distress.
Now that you have made hard decisions where are you going to take your operation? More importantly where is that Big Bank in your town taking its operation? Just as credit unions have made hard decisions so have BigBanks. The fall out on both sides has been much like a no holds barred tournament as the weaker have fallen prey to stronger. In the third quarter alone 41 banks have thrown in the towel for a total of 127 so far this year. The closing of the doors were often no more than changes in the signage as they were quickly taken over by the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.), who changed the name on the front door (but kept the FDIC sticker) over a weekend. Make no mistake more will evaporate. Last time I did a Google search (again another very unscientific method )there were 860 banks on the FDIC's list of problem institutions as of September 30. That is up from 829 at the end of June.
Before we all rejoice we should consider that like many of us the BigBanks are again finding their feet and are up for another round. For the third quarter, banking industry profits leaped higher as revenues increased and loan loss reserves subsided. For the group of about 7700 banks and thrifts net income was $14.5 billion. That's up around 12 billion from last year in the third period.
More good news is that the percentage of banks losing money at the end of the quarter was the lowest level since June 2008, when the economy was about to plunge over the cliff. If you were to look back a year ago, almost 33% of all U.S. banks were bleeding red ink. Fast forward today and now, it's less than one in five.
Make no mistake we are all in for a tough round two. Unlike that fight I watched so long ago this time BigBanks are taking off the gloves all together as they work to challenge us in our local markets and in our legislative arenas. Tax exempt status is back on the table as The Independent Community Bankers Association (ICBA) argues bad investments by credit unions have led to the takeover of five corporate credit unions by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) during the past 18 months. Big Bank are hiring top talent in your ranks as they again rev up their profit centers. This time around they are focused on gaining back bread and butter consumer relationships from your members. Are you Ready to Rumble ?
Practical Application:
As you look to next year who do you see as your competition for your members attention and in meeting their financial needs?
How are you adjusting your hiring strategies to make sure you bring in the talent you need to take your organization to the next level?
Do your top performers share best practices or are they quite so as to not upset their peers?
How skilled are your staff members at articulating the points of differentiation for your institution?
As Big Banks are flooded with money and are again hiring what is your strategy to retain top talent in your organization?